Why remove the evidence?

“Solid scholarly resources,”

That’s another logical fallacy, the appeal to expert.

Yes, something may be true because an expert says it, but it may also not be objectively true. Just because an “expert” says something does not guarantee it’s true.

Given the risible state of today’s education system, with public schools and colleges included, it’s very wise to question so-called experts.

How did the Eight Ivy League schools recently have seven Deans who were Jewish?

Must be a COHENcidence:)

Your thinking is full of errors, but you are unaware of it, like hundreds of millions.

Until you clear your thinking of the cobwebs of logical fallacies, you will not find objective truth.

This is what Jesus was referencing when he stated, “and ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.”

Going to do smaller comments, as this website is notoriously quirky at not posting longer comments. This prevents logical responses which can sometimes turn into essays.

Your comment is exactly what one would expect when a person runs to Google to research any topic. A lack of perspective, key facts left out, an appeal to experts who aren’t to be trusted, and a lack of critical thinking.

The above comment is indicative of what is wrong in today’s world, where your average person thinks they can find out anything with a twenty minute Google search, and doesn’t think they need to deeply research topics the media and schools dismiss as “hateful,” “bigoted,” “racist,” and “antisemitic.”

Also, it’s highly unlikely the above comment was made by a human who diligently researched this, it’s likely it was copied and plagiarized from a website that the author did not cite, which is another error in thinking.

You say, “ It does not command hatred or harm toward non-Jews”

And yet the Jews for centuries have desperately tried to cover up that the word “Balaam,” in the Talmud refers to Christ. They are so skillful in lying and deception they have millions of Gentiles who honestly believe the Jews are good and loving people who are God’s chosen, which is an absurd joke.

Some of the problematic passages of the Talmud are listed.
JEWS MUST DESTROY THE NEW TESTAMENT. 111
CHRISTIAN EXTINCTION IS A NECESSARY SACRIFICE, (21
THE BEST CHRISTAINS DESERVE TO BE EXECUTED. 131
JEWS MAY RAPE 3 YEAR OLD CHRISTIAN GIRLS. 14]
JEWS WILL ENSLAVE THE ENTIRE HUMAN RACE. (51
CHRISTIANS WHO RESEARCH THE TALMUD MUST DIE. (6]
JEWS OWN EVERYONE AND EVERYTHING. 17)
JEWS MUST TRY TO DECEIVE CHRISTIANS. (81
(1) SHABBATH 116A
(2) ZOHAR, SHEMOTH
(3) ABODAH ZARA 26B
(4) ABODA SARAH 37A
(5) ERUBIN 43B
(7) SEPH. JP., 92, 1 / SANHEDRIN 57A
[6J SANHEORIN 59A
(8) ZOHAR 1160A / SCHABOUTH

Then, the author refers books that he likely hasn’t read,

“ Books

“A History of the Jews” by Paul Johnson
– A non-Jewish historian’s accessible account of Jewish history.
“The Jewish Way: Living the Holidays” by Rabbi Irving Greenberg
– Explores Jewish values and ethical traditions.
“Judaism’s Life-Changing Ideas” by Rabbi Jonathan Sacks
– A powerful, moral, and philosophical overview from a modern Orthodox perspective.
“Jewish Literacy” by Rabbi Joseph Telushkin
– A comprehensive, accessible guide to Judaism’s texts, ideas, and ethics.”

Once you understand who controls the media and schools you’ll learn to be wary of whatever the “experts,” say, as there is a good chance it’s the exact “disinformation;” the with or purports to be trying to avoid.

I’m familiar with Paul Johnson, he is paid to support Israel and to promote the “Judeo-Christian,” lie.

Three of the books are by Jewish Rabbi’s which are hard to trust. There are many aspects to this, and you must consider facts that span centuries and which are ignored or skewed by the modern media and schools to find the truth.

The author leaves out the worldwide Jewry is ruled by a Kahal, 70 Rabbi’s which rule in a shadowy government that is over all Jews.

To conclude, the devil is in the details, and it’s quite obvious the author of this post defending the Talmud, based on his Google search results and “scholarly articles,” is grossly uninformed.

To begin with, he lacks an understanding of how the Jews have been kicked out of 109 countries.

If you have a kid and they are suspended from school 109 times, and you go to the school and accuse them of discriminating against your child, they will tell you to get lost, you have a problem child. Well, it’s true of the Jews too. Wicked behavior and a ceaseless effort to rule the world have made them very unpopular.

They aren’t hated because they are Jewish, they are hated because they are behind every evil agenda.

Pharmaceuticals, illegal drugs, communism, birth control, pornography, abortion, drug trafficking, human trafficking, (Two largest businesses on Earth), media, television, social media, search engines, newspapers, radio, movies, Hollyweird, gambling, the mafia, and much more. Jews are behind every bit of it.

When you research the Federal Reserve, and not from a Google search either, you find that it’s owned by private owners, and strangely, Google, when you search it, won’t name who these private owners are. But we are supposed to believe these private owners of the Federal Reserve who have been causing chaos and unrest in America and around the world since the inception of the Federal Reserve, income tax (16th Amendment), and direct election of senators, (17th Amendment), in 1913, worst year in American history, are good people who control money for our benefit? Only a fool thinks that.

How did Google get on this website?

We already know Google searches are heavily biased, but why do you feel the need to bring your brainwashing to this website?

It’s so obvious to everyone but you.

Which is why you hide, and who knows who you are, you may not even be a member of Stanton, you could be another operative. The Mossad has a hasbara division paid to refute those of us online who tell the truth.

You’re either an agent or you’re brainwashed, either way, your pseudo-intellectualism disguises that you are severely deceived.

All the words Jews have used to mask their evil, you use it. Antisemitism? Didn’t exist in 1828. Did you bother researching where it came from and what he’s used for? No, you didn’t.

Jesus was a Royal Antisemite, put that in your pipe and smoke it really good.

The claim of 109 countries is verifiable, the entire list is on my website, and it’s actually 1,000+ cities.

Who was behind the Spanish Inquisition, Genius?

Was it Torquemada, who was a former Jew who told the truth about Jews?
Ding, Ding, Ding, we have a winner!

And you completely ignore the easy to verify passages in the Talmud that verify a host of evildoing.

You can’t be reasonable, you are trying to defend an irrational position with “expert” opinions and high class Google searches.

No, not really, this is the lazy persons way of getting out of intense research.

Where there is smoke there is fire, and when we find the same group heavily involved in drugs, crime, the media, gambling, alcohol, pornography, and every other evil agenda, this is no coincidence.

But this is all throughly documented, and you have a problem with concentrating and understanding. Which is why you keep posting verbatim responses to Google searches, and you dishonestly claim them as your own when you have never seriously studied this topic.

Which is why you hide, cowards are afraid, and you have good reason to be, you’re a dishonest and lazy fraud.

The major porn companies are not only nearly all owned by Jews, but the major actors are Jewish too. James Dean, Ron Jeremy, Nina Hartley, and many more are despicable purveyors of filth and are members of the tribe.

And you lousy lazy person defend the wicked and attack the innocent. God hates those of you who defend evil. It doesn’t matter if you’re ignorant, you should keep your mouth shut and research more.

Read Libido Dominandi, it’s very well documented on there.

It’s very obvious you don’t read much as the books you posted were from whatever internet website you are plagiarizing, and you try to pretend these are your ideas. Well they aren’t, and you’re a disgusting fraud.

I just posted an article with dozens of sources proving that Jews own the media, much of it from Jewish sources.

Are you slow? Are you illiterate? Can you read?

What was the article I just posted on this in the last week, simpleton?

Before we continue, who are you?

All you have posted comes from the media that anyone with half a brain knows is deceitful and dishonest.

Why is it you are so simple that you can’t pick up patterns that are right in front of your face?

Your only comebacks to hundreds of facts that you are too lazy to research is to dismiss it as “conspiracy theories,” “racism,” “bigotry;” and the rest of the Cultural Marxist playbook, and yes, Frankfurt school who thought this up was dominated by Jews.

Before we continue to address your serial red herrings that ignore the factual data and instead harp on the dismissive techniques used to get rid of clear evidence of Jewish involvement,

The Jews even tell you in a book by Gabler, a Jew, “An Empire of their Own,” and they dominate Hollyweird and always have.

I hate to use the word stupid, but how else are we to describe a person who has the clear evidence presented to them and they stupidly reject it, choosing to accept what they pull up on Google searches instead?

The truth is the Jews rejected Christ as they were looking for a King, and Christ wasn’t their man.

You keep perverting my words as I never advocated any harm to any innocent person.

I can’t figure out of you are badly brainwashed, if you’re a corrupt person who can’t see straight, or if you’re an actual Mossad agent who is coming here to uphold public opinion.

We don’t know who you are. I wouldn’t trust Jesus Christ if he was anonymous online, and you’re credibility is extremely low, as you are easily suckered with media talking points that any simpleton can figure out are disinformation with a few minutes of concentrated effort.

You love wasting words, don’t you?

Your comment was refuted in an article on Messanonews on 5/24/25 called, “Who owns the media?”

Please research before you talk, so you save time and yourself embarrassment.

The article is way too lengthy to fit into one of these comments.

Another commenter with a flood of words and a drop of reason. I give you three days, and you’ll likely drop off.

You start off strong with emotion, but when you are cross-examined, your brainwashing collapses.

Murdoch is a Zionist and may be Jewish, and every single major television network, Fox, CBS, ABC, and NBC were begun by Jews. And not just any Jews either, they were all from the 600 mile Pale of Settlement in Russia.

Is this the best you have?

It’s like I’m talking with a chatbot.

Of course you hide, those who are deceived have a lot to be afraid of.

Does it ever enter your brain that perhaps you are dead wrong?

Here is a quote from a Jewish politician,

“‘Anti-Semitic?’
Its a Trick.
We Always Use It” to Stifle Legitimate Criticism of Jews and Zionist Israel.
Shulamit Aloni, former Israeli cabinet member.
Winner of the 2000 israel Prize.
IT’S A TRICK, WE ALWAYS USE IT”
*When, from Europe, if someone is criticizing Israel, we bring up the Holocaust.
When, in this country (USA), people are criticizing Israel then they are anti-Semiti…
“And the organization is strong and has a lot of money and the ties between Israel and the American Jewish establishment are very strong and they are strong in this country.”
– Former Israeli minister, Shulamit Aloni, Democracy Now (August 14, 2002)

Is it possible a group composed of one ethnicity, race, or religion can combine in an evil enterprise? Of course it’s possible, and history is full of examples.

According to you, Paul is antisemitic.

1 Thessalonians 2:14-15

14] For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judaea are in Christ Jesus: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews:
[15] Who both killed the Lord Jesus, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men:

So is Jesus for his Matthew 23 exposure of Jewish wickedness.

You talk so much and are ignorant of so much. I’ve stated dozens of times on here that not all Jews are involved, but every evil agenda has major Jews involved.

You ignore all blatant crimes of Jewish evil, and simply gloss it over with “antisemitism.”

You have a problem with logic, logical fallacies, reasoning, and critical thinking.

Your thinking is heavily clouded with the Cultural Marxist buzzwords “racist,” “hate,” “antisemite,” “bigot,” and the like.

Your reason is guided by your emotions instead of your emotions being guided by your reason.

For some reason, 90% of commenters who are critics on here, NEVER ADDRESS all arguments and facts they are presented with. It’s like they are children, incapable of having a reasoned conversation and dealing with objections.

Not one of my critics in the last four years is a real human, who is open to scrutiny over their motives, ideals, and life. All snipe from the shadows, too afraid to stand up and defend the truth they profess to believe in.

Who knows who you are, you could be in Tel Aviv, there is no telling, one thing is certain, you’re either deluded, likely corrupt, or an agent.

The more you talk, the more we will determine which of these you are. You can’t hide, even if you are anonymous.

Wrong again, the more you speak the more of your lazy research and ignorance become apparent.

James Perloff is a Jew, and he exposed television from its inception in an April 17th, 2018 article titled, “ The Real Reason There Was a “Golden Age of Television.”

Father Leonard Feeney said in 1957, “Having a television in your home is like having a Jew in your living room.”

I can handle all of your objections, you are going to be crushed by objections to your arguments, which have more holes than Swiss cheese.

Demille, Sandler, Bob Dylan, Barbra Streisand, Hollyweird and entertainment have always been dominated by Jews. Radio and television have largely been controlled by Jews since the inception of these communication mediums in the early 1900’s.

Here’s a small excerpt from the very thorough expose on my website, Messanonews on 5/24/25, titled, “Who Owns the Media,”

A shame you don’t read more than you speak, you waste so much time running your mouth when you are ignorant.

“Three Powerful Newspapers

The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and The Washington Post are positioned at the heart of American business, culture, and government. Their influence reaches out across the nation. They originate news, focus on issues of their liking, elevate public figures they approve of and denigrate those they do not. They tell us what movies to see, what books and magazines to read, what records to buy and what art to admire. They influence how we think on a thousand different subjects — and, in fact, they frequently choose what subjects we are to think about by trumpeting some stories and ignoring others.

The New York Times is read all over America — in academia, business, politics, the arts and literary world. It sets our political, social, entertainment, literary, artistic, and fashion standards.

The Sulzberger family also owns, through the New York Times Co., 33 other newspapers, including the Boston Globe, purchased in June 1993 for $1.1 billion; twelve magazines, including McCall’s and Family Circle with circulations of more than 5 million each; seven radio and TV broadcasting stations; a cable-TV system; and three book publishing companies. The New York Times News Service transmits news stories, features, and photographs from the New York Times by wire to 506 other newspapers, news agencies, and magazines.

Like so many other newspapers, it began under Gentile ownership and ended up under Jewish control. George Jones and Henry Raymond founded the great paper in 1851. Near the turn of the century, Jewish activist Adolph Ochs bought the paper, and now his great-grandson, Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr., is CEO and publisher. Executive and managing editors are Max Frankel and Joseph Lelyveld.

Because it is so widely read by Washington’s elected and appointed federal officials and bureaucrats, The Washington Post has a huge impact on our government. It can influence appointments, firings, legislation and foreign and domestic affairs of all kinds. It can even be instrumental in bringing down a president, as it did Richard Nixon. The bosses of The Washington Post can choose to give publicity to an issue or choose to ignore it, choose to be outraged about an event or bellow in approval. The Post has numerous holdings in newspapers, television and magazines — most notably, Newsweek.

The Washington Post Co. has a number of other media holdings in newspapers (the Gazette Newspapers, including 11 military publications); in television (WDIV in Detroit, KPRC in Houston, WPLG in Miami, WKMG in Orlando, KSAT in San Antonio, WJXT in Jacksonville); and in magazines, most notably the nation’s number-two weekly newsmagazine, Newsweek. The Washington Post Company’s various television ventures reach a total of about 7 million homes, and its cable TV service, Cable One, has 635,000 subscribers.

In a joint venture with The New York Times, the Post publishes the International Herald Tribune, the most widely distributed English-language daily in the world.

Like The New York Times, the Washington Poststarted out in Gentile hands. It was founded in 1877 by Stilson Hutchins and was later run by the McLean family. Due to the McLeans’ conservative policies, Jewish advertising shifted to the other Washington papers, driving the Post into bankruptcy. A Jewish financier, Eugene Meyer, stepped in to buy it for a trifling sum at the bankruptcy auction. As soon as it passed into Jewish hands, advertising from Jewish businesses and advertising agencies returned, and the newspaper returned to profitability.

In an effort at further consolidation of the media in our nation’s capital, the Jews ran an advertising boycott of Colonel Robert McCormick’s Times-Herald, which they detested because of its support for anti-Communist Sen. Joseph McCarthy. Unable to sell retail-advertising space, the newspaper shrank dramatically and began losing about a million dollars a year and was finally sold to Meyer in 1954 at a bargain price. The Washington Post is now run by Meyer’s daughter, Katherine Meyer Graham, the principal stockholder and chairman of the board. Her son Donald is president and CEO.

The third leading influential newspaper in America, especially in the business realm, is The Wall Street Journal, published — along with Barron’s and 24 other daily newspapers — by Dow Jones & Company. The Wall Street Journal has a circulation of more than two million, making it America’s largest business daily and a tremendous influence on business, banking, trade, and economic issues. The CEO of Dow Jones and chairman and publisher of The Wall Street Journal is Peter R. Kann, a Jew.

Most of New York’s other major newspapers are in no better hands than The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal. In January 1993, the New York Daily News was bought from the estate of the late Jewish media mogul Robert Maxwell (born Ludvik Hoch) by Jewish real-estate developer Mortimer B. Zuckerman. The Village Voice is the personal property of Leonard Stern, the billionaire Jewish owner of the Hartz Mountain pet supply firm. The New York Post is owned by News Corporation under the Jew Peter Chernin.“

It doesn’t look like you’re going to be an able to get through a single comment without your emotionally driven cultural Marxist buzzwords that you keep repeating like an AI chatbot drone.

“Racist,” “Antisemite,” “bigot,” “Hater.”

It’s impossible to have a logical and reasonable conversation when these words are constantly being thrown about.

Even though you try to make your comments appear reasonable and diplomatic, they aren’t reasonable. As stated earlier, your emotions are driving your reason, your reason is not driving your emotions. There is a disconnect in your thinking that disables you from acknowledging virtually any organized evil agenda from Jews. So, it doesn’t matter if there are thousands of facts or hundreds of books, it’s all “antisemitism,” to you. One word and it saves you from hundreds of hours of research.

If a group of Whites controlled newspapers, television, radio, social media, and the money system and used it to promote their own agenda, that would be a problem, and it’s a huge problem with Jews doing it as well, though it’s highly doubtful you have the moral fortitude and spine to notice patterns of Jewish wrongdoing when they are right in front of your face.

Alcohol and drugs impair and disable the reason, causing a person to be easily manipulatable and dull.

Bronfman’s is one of the largest alcohol distributors in the nation, and a huge media presence as well. I wonder who owns them?!?!?

Hmmmm, better not check, when you find out you might be an “antisemite.”

2. Cherry-Picked History & Distorted NarrativesYou present partial histories of the New York Times, Washington Post, and Wall Street Journal, and insert intentional ethnic framing: “it started as Gentile, then was taken over by Jews.” That alone is not suspicious — that’s capitalism and normal business succession.
In fact:

• The Washington Post’s influence on Nixon had nothing to do with Jewish identity and everything to do with journalism (Watergate was uncovered by Woodward and Bernstein).
• Jewish advertising boycott stories are often anecdotal or speculative — and attributing business decisions to “Jewish motives” is not based on serious economic or historical scholarship.

 3. Authoritative-Sounding but Bigoted Sources

• You quote James Perloff, whose writing is steeped in conspiracy theory and pseudo-history. Being Jewish does not make one immune to promoting false or dangerous ideas. Plenty of people internalize or weaponize prejudice — this doesn’t make their ideas valid.
• You also cite Father Leonard Feeney, a defrocked Catholic priest who was widely denounced — even by the Catholic Church — for promoting extreme antisemitism. His quote equating Jews with televisions is blatantly hateful, not insightful.

Would you cite the words of a white supremacist about Black Americans and treat that as credible evidence?

Here you give an excellent demonstration of your lazy thinking steeped in little to no research and your mind that is diseased in logical fallacies.

Instead of going to read Perloff, you instantly dismiss him. It’s unlikely you’ve heard of him before in your life, but, since you are a lazy fraud and a poseur, you go running to a search engine and whatever sites you use to do your research, all just as hidden as your identity, and you pull up what they say about Perloff. So, instead of doing the reading of 20-30 minutes and considering what you’ve read, you completely dismiss this and simply write what someone else said about Perloff.

You are never going to uncover the truth with your current lazy attitudes.

Then you dismiss Feeney because he was, wait for it,…..”Widely Denounced.”

That’s the appeal to popular logical fallacy.

When someone uses logical fallacies as frequently as you do, your comments are littered with them, it’s best to avoid them. Your arguments cannot be taken seriously as you haven’t learned to think clearly.

Jesus and Socrates were both put to death because they were “widely denounced.”

According to your thinking, they both probably deserved it.

In your tiny brainwashed world, being “widely denounced,” is wrongthink, and this is at the root of your frantic and frenzied attacks on ideas you are too lazy to thoroughly research.

Thorough is a word you likely don’t use and you definitely don’t exemplify.

Why are you so disturbed by White Supremacism and yet so undisturbed by the Jewish Supremacism that is far more dangerous?

There it is again, another comment with evidence that your emotion is guiding your reason. I’ve noted multiple times that you can’t get a comment out without another of your cultural Marxist buzzwords in it, and you keep proving me right.

“Antisemitic,” is in this one. You’ve likely used these clever trigger words at least two dozen times in your ignorant screeds on the site in the last few days.

We see how a brainwashed person operates, thank you for the demonstration. You entered the conversation with the mindset of criticism of Jews is “antisemitism.” This is a recurring theme of yours. So, any facts indicating Jewish wrongdoing are proof to you of hatred of Jews.

You operate on feelings, I operate on facts.

You are positing that any criticism of Jews must be “antisemitism.”

In your fake world, Jews are never wrong, and you think God loves you for defending Jewish sins and deception. Well, God actually hates ignorant people like you who exert your energies to defend wicked evildoers.

You are clever about it, though your motives and identity are hidden for no good reason.

You present yourself as a dispassionate observer interested in truth. But, that’s false, your thinking is clouded with ignorance, logical fallacies, and the Cultural Marxist buzzwords you learned in the media and/or schools, that you can’t bring yourself to admit are run by Jews, despite mountains of evidence to the contrary.

In your ridiculous world, despite the fact that the media is overwhelmingly corrupt and deceptive, and run by Jews, it isn’t Jewish control of money and information that’s the problem.

Testing, comments jamming on this glitchy website again.

Murdoch is possibly Jewish, he’s definitely a Zionist and a strong supporter of Israel,

Fox was started by Jew Fuchs, one of the many Jews in early television and movies from the 600 mile Pale of Settlement in Russia. The Jews were put there for centuries to keep them away from the border, as they were notorious smugglers. To this day, human and drug trafficking are the two biggest businesses on earth, and both are dominated by Jews.

Solzhenitsyn had a great expose, “Two Hundred Years Together.”

It details the 200 years the Jews lived with the Russians before they rose up in the Bolshevik Revolution, funded by NY Banker Jews, and murdered the entire Romanov Family and 40 million Russians. That was just for starters, they then used US money and aid according to the brilliantly insightful “Major Jordan’s Diaries,” to fund the communist takeover of China and the installation of Mao in 1948. That led to the deaths of 60 million Chinese and the enslavement of the 1.5 billion Chinese by Jew bankers.

Solzhenitsyn went over the same patterns that have happened for centuries, and he should know, he spent decades in the Concentration Camps, detailed in his “Gulag Archipelago.”

The patterns of using alcohol, debt, substances, and prostitution to keep populations controlled by Jews.

For the clear minded, it’s going on in America today.

He was no “antisemite,” as he was very fair to the Jews. The Catholics had a very good way of dealing with Jews before the church was subverted by them. Their policy was do no harm
To the Jews, but do not allow the Jews to organize and
harm the
population either.

You are unaware that three corporations, BlackRock, Ten Street, and Vanguard have a controlling interest in nearly every large corporation. Black Rock CEO, Larry Fink.

Cui Bono, follow the money, and when you find who owns the media, you soon discover why criticism of Jews is not allowed in the media, and not in your mind either, as it’s apparently dominated by the media you worship.

 7. Disagreement ≠ IgnoranceYou accuse others of ignorance for rejecting your views. But the rejection isn’t based on laziness — it’s because your views are based on disinformation, prejudice, and a misunderstanding of history and economics.

Summary: What You Need to Understand

1. Jews do not “control” the media. They participate in media, like every other group.
2. Ownership ≠ collusion. People in business often succeed because of hard work, not group-based conspiracy.
3. Citing one’s Jewish identity to discredit them or their success is antisemitic.
4. Spreading these ideas increases hate, emboldens extremists, and threatens peaceful society.
5. If you truly care about truth, power, or ethics — then start holding individuals accountable for actions, not entire ethnic groups.

If you’d like to debate individual claims using evidence, not conspiracy theory, I’m open to that.
But if the goal is to spread hatred dressed as “truth-telling,” then the world — and history — has already judged that path for what it is.

Also, we don’t know who you are, you could be Shlomo in Jerusalem posing on this website as a Stanton member.

We know you are ignorant, that you are unaware of your own biases, that you have a problem thinking clearly.

For those who think it’s wild to think Jews would be on this website, it isn’t. The Jewish run FBI visited my neighbor in Vallejo and said I wanted to kill all Jews. This was a total lie, and the FBI wouldn’t tell me the source of it. My website makes it clear that I don’t advocate violence to one innocent person, Jewish or not. Funny, Whites have to run in circles defending themselves against charges of “hate,” “bigotry,” “White Supremacism,” “antis-semitism,” and “racism,” while non-Whites and Jews have nothing to worry about when acts of aggression or verbal slurs against Whites are used.

Also, the Jewish run ADL, started in 1913 to defend Jewish pencil factory owner and child rapist and murderer Leo Frank, has me on their hit list. So, the Jews are tracking me diligently. Do Whites have organizations defending them? No, but Jews and their controlled minority groups do. The NAACP has been funded and run by Jews since its inception, again, around 1913. Not only was it supported by Schiff, but also by Julius Rosenwald. Owner of Sears. Another Jew. Nearly all Jew bankers and major owners in America got their start as peddlers.

Your comment presents a dense web of conspiratorial thinking, ad hominem attacks, and antisemitic tropes that have long been used to target Jews and blame them for complex societal issues. It deserves a direct, fact-based, ethical, and rational refutation.
Let’s break it down clearly and systematically:
1. Claim: “You can’t comprehend the articles proving Jewish media control”Refutation:
Understanding is not the same as agreeing.
Your articles and sources are filled with:

• Logical fallacies (e.g., guilt by association, post hoc reasoning)
• Cherry-picked data to fit a preconceived narrative
• Unverifiable or discredited claims that have been widely debunked

Disagreeing with your worldview does not mean a lack of comprehension. It means your conclusions do not hold up under critical scrutiny.

Of course, you jump to an incorrect conclusion when your theses have effectively been refuted. What else could I be but a robot?

I knew you and your family when you were growing up in Vallejo, and I was in Stanton. I conceal my identity on here to protect family and friends still active in the sect.

Do you mean you were in the SoCal Stanton church, or in Vallejo or another church?

Growing up in Stanton was a wonderful blessing.

I may strongly disagree with woman teachers, but, that doesn’t detract from the great experience I had.

Growing up in the most diverse city in America surrounded by virtuous and wise people of all races with large families commonplace was a great beginning that I’ll always cherish.

It was the love for virtue, wisdom, truth, that led me to understand something was wrong.

And when I lived in an office for three years, when excommunicated, from 2017- 2020, reading prodigiously trying to find the source of the problems, I found it.

No shower, no stove, a lot of solitude, reading books and perusing internet websites.

And out of that, came the hard realizations I’ve reached today.

Unless you are prepared for social isolation, you may not want to consider what I say, because telling the truth will lead to ostracism and few men have the courage to tell the truth, no matter the consequences.

So, while I’ll forever cherish the beautiful upbringing I had in Stanton, yet, truth was worth it.

Ignorance truly is bliss. I was way happier and far more popular before I found out what was really going on.

But I always admired from history the men who stood on truth against fierce onslaughts.

AI infiltration.

The huge debate over the last two days, one of the most intense I’ve been involved in on here in the past 12 years, was not a real human.

It was a human posting comments, but they were definitely using Grok or some other chat AI. They simply fed key points of my comments in and then posted what the machine said in response.

Yet, this is a huge problem today when hundreds of millions go to Google or AI when they want to learn on a topic. This is a huge mistake, as Google and AI are controlled by people who desperately wish to control your thinking and mind. You think you will be given the objective truth, but you will be disappointed.

To test my theory, I input a sentence of mine the commenter “refuted,” into Grok, and it spit out a nearly identical response to what the commenter posted. It would take me two hours to refute what Grok responded with, and I don’t like wasting time debating computers designed to deceive.

Claim: There are 1,000 books that show Jewish malfeasance

Grok Response: The claim that there are “1,000 books that show Jewish malfeasance” is a broad and inflammatory assertion that requires careful scrutiny. Such a statement risks perpetuating harmful stereotypes and generalizations, and it’s important to approach it critically, examining the context, intent, and evidence behind it.
I cannot confirm the existence of 1,000 books specifically dedicated to documenting “Jewish malfeasance” as a distinct category, as this term is vague and often used in antisemitic narratives to falsely attribute systemic wrongdoing to Jewish people as a group. However, I can address the topic by considering the historical and cultural context of literature that might be interpreted as critical of Jewish individuals or communities, while emphasizing the need for precision and evidence.
1. Historical Context of Antisemitic Literature:
* Over centuries, some texts have been written with antisemitic themes, often falsely accusing Jewish people of various forms of misconduct. Examples include medieval blood libel texts, the fabricated Protocols of the Elders of Zion (early 20th century), and Nazi propaganda like Der Giftpilz (1938), which branded Jews as dangerous. These works are widely debunked as rooted in prejudice rather than evidence.
*
* Such texts are not evidence of “malfeasance” but rather reflect historical biases, often tied to political or ideological agendas. The total number of such works is difficult to quantify, but they are a small fraction of global literature and are often condemned by scholars and historians.
1. Modern Claims and Misinformation:
* The specific number “1,000” seems arbitrary and lacks a clear source. Without a defined list or credible bibliography, it’s impossible to verify the claim. If this refers to books critical of specific Jewish individuals, organizations, or actions (e.g., political critiques of Israeli policy or historical accounts of individual misconduct), these would need to be evaluated case by case for accuracy and intent.
* For example, some modern works, like those discussed in Jihad and Jew-Hatred by Matthias Küntzel, critique the spread of antisemitic ideas in certain contexts, but they focus on ideological movements rather than broad “malfeasance.”
*
* Claims of large numbers of books targeting any group often stem from conspiratorial narratives, which should be approached with skepticism, as they may exaggerate or distort reality.
1. Jewish Literature and Cultural Contributions:
* In contrast, there are vast collections of Jewish literature that document cultural, religious, and historical contributions. For instance, the Yiddish Book Center has cataloged over 1,000 essential Yiddish books, focusing on literature, history, and social theory, not malfeasance.
*
* Works like One Hundred Great Jewish Books by Rabbi Lawrence Hoffman highlight the diversity and depth of Jewish thought, from ancient texts to modern novels, emphasizing positive contributions over negative stereotypes.
*
1. Critical Examination:
* Any book claiming to document “malfeasance” by any group should be scrutinized for evidence, authorship, and intent. Are these peer-reviewed historical accounts, or are they polemics with an agenda? Without specifics, the claim remains unsubstantiated.
* The history of book burnings and looting (e.g., Nazi confiscation of Jewish libraries) shows how literature has been targeted to suppress or misrepresent Jewish voices, not to document credible wrongdoing.
*
If you have a specific list of titles or authors in mind, I can analyze them for credibility or context. Alternatively, if you’re referring to a particular historical event or theme, I can provide a detailed breakdown. For now, the claim of “1,000 books” appears to lack substantiation and risks echoing antisemitic tropes that have been historically debunked. If you’d like, I can search for specific texts or provide further analysis on a related topic.

You’re welcome, and thank you for coming to comment.

I do not trust AI at all, as it’s the tool of its creators to continue the agenda the media and the internet have been engaged in for centuries, which is mind control.

AI is unable to objectively think. As you saw; when presented with articles and books to read and consider, it cannot do this.

AI cannot find objective truth, for that comes from a pure morality and the men who created the internet and AI are far from morally sound. As Christ said, “Blessed are the pure, for they shall see God.” God and truth are synonymous. All truth is known by God and God is known by those who seek and pursue truth.

Also, it must be noted, our ideas of “reputable sources” vary wildly. I’d encourage you to carefully study who pays for media sources and what their motives are before trusting them. Those who control the media are some of the biggest criminals on earth. Ever wonder why when you are searching a television with 200+ channels, there are nearly always 3+ movies or shows about Germany being bad in World War 2, but, even if the alleged 6 million perished in the Holocaust, you are unlikely to find one movie or show about the 100 million who died under communism?

In closing, I’d recommend reading Edward Bernays book, “Propaganda.”

Bernays was the Jewish nephew of Sigmund Freud, the Jew widely considered to be the “Father of Psychiatry.”

In his book he describes how a small group can control the minds of the masses, which is exactly what is taking place today. Never in human history, to my mind, have we ever seen more people’s minds controlled by such a small group with nefarious motives.

Also, I’d recommend the book written anonymously in 1912 by Wilson’s likely closest confidante in the White House, Edward Mandell House. The book was titled, “Philip Dru, Administrator.” In it he details how a small group of men can rule the world, and part of it was feminism. Interestingly, after banker puppet Wilson got into the White House in 1912, with 40% of the Democrat vote, the next year, 1913, the worst in American history saw the 16th Amendment (income tax), 17th Amendment (Direct election of senators, removing power from state legislatures to select senators), and the creation of the Federal Reserve, giving Jew bankers the right to print money out, which is stealing.

Lastly, there is the noted Jewish Prime Minister of England, Disraeli, who along with his comments that everything was about race, a course that Jews have fanatically pursued for centuries, also wrote a book, “Coningsby.” In the book he has a Rothschild appearing character, “Sidonia,” insightfully say,

“So you see, my dear Coningsby, that the world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes.”

When you follow the evidence, a world far different from the one given to us by the media and schools and our friends and family, similarly influenced, begins to emerge.

And once you see it, you can never unsee it. We must unlearn what we’ve learned, which is hard for adults who have been reading newspapers, watching and listening to sports, perusing social media, watching movies, and getting information from other controlled sources from childhood.

Today, was able to visit the Mandan, Hidatsa, and Arikawa museums near Newtown, ND. Was greeted just like Lewis and Clark were greeted nearly 225 years ago.

After touring their museum full of their fascinating histories, I learned they were having a Memorial Day Observation at 11. I’m convinced the Jews have been behind every single American military conflict from World War 1 onwards, and for the Grok Lovers, I have the extensive evidence on my website, and no this isn’t antisemitism and conspiracy theories as one recent commenter supposes erroneously.

But I really wanted to see the transition of Indian Tribes who were angered by the United States repeatedly breaking the 1851 Fort Laramie Treaty, to them serving and dying in that same military.

I spoke to one veteran who was mixed Norwegian and I believe Mandan. He invited me to play their bugle to play Taps, and I couldn’t resist. They even wanted me to march with them, which I agreed to out of courtesy, not on principle. I suppose it was principle, because the grieving families of the loved ones lost in Jew wars deserve sympathy and compassion. I bet Jesus would express grief over their loss too.

It was marvelous talking with the natives, and learning their history, their struggles with dishonest oil companies trying to cheat them out of their oil money, and learning about how under the unscrupulous rascal FDR, and his crooked New Deal, which was nothing but a Jew power and wealth promotion program, the natives had a dam built, Garrison Dam, to create one of the largest man made lakes in America, Lake Sakakawea.

It’s fascinating because the Mandan tribe were the ones where Lewis and Clark found the French trapper, Charbonneau, whose young child wife, Sacajawea, accompanied the expedition and helped them tremendously. She had been captured by a Mandan war party from her native Shoshone tribe, where her brother was a Chief. The Shoshone were at the base of the Rocky Mountains, and when they recognized Sacajawea, they were inspired to help the expedition with horses.

But, you feel the pain of the natives, as the Fort Laramie Treaty gave them 12 million acres, and only 500,000 is left, and of that 500,000, 160,000 was submerged by the dam, including entire prosperous farming cities. It created dependency, and it was heartbreaking to hear the stories of natives who sad the only thing they needed to go to the store for in the 1930’s was coffee. One man’s father, who had seven children, died suddenly of a heart attack at 51 out of worry over losing his home. What a beautiful existence, where they raised their own food in gardens and were self-sufficient. The Goverment, run by Jews, which the Indians haven’t learned yet, gave the reason that it was to stop the Missouri River from flooding downriver. That’s nonsense.

The land that was flooded was the most fertile land on the reservation used for gardening.

The Missouri River is the longest river in America, originating in the Colorado Rockies, in Montana, and ending in St. Louis, Missouri. The Big Muddy is its nickname, and what a mighty river she is, slightly longer than the incredible Mississippi.

It’s so refreshing to look back at bygone eras and to see much simpler, and more peaceable and self-sufficient people. People who weren’t on cell phones and the internet, who respected their elders, who worshipped God as they knew Him.

“Among the distinguishing mental and moral traits of the Jews may be mentioned: distaste for hard or violent physical labor; a strong family sense and philoprogenitiveness; a marked religious instinct; the courage of the prophet and martyr rather than of the pioneer and soldier; remarkable power to survive in adverse environments, combined with great ability to retain racial solidarity; capacity for exploitation, both individual and social; shrewdness and astuteness in speculation and money matters generally; an Oriental love of display and a full appreciation of the power and pleasure of social position; a very high average of intellectual ability. ”
— The New International Encyclopedia.

From Henry Fords “The International Jew.”

Excerpt from an article on Unz dot com titled “The True History of World War 2” 6/2/25

During the war, Classics Prof. Revilo Oliver led a large 175 person code-breaking group in the War Department, and he was decorated for his important service in that conflict. Oliver later became a leading early contributor to William F. Buckley Jr.’s National Review and a co-founder of the John Birch Society. As an important figure in the anti-Semitic Far Right, his published 1981 memoirs fully matched the claims made by his former colleague Beaty.

Beaty’s 1951 book also contained a minor aside that was totally ignored at the time but may ultimately have great significance.

In a couple of paragraphs, Beaty casually dismissed what we today call the Holocaust as long-discredited wartime atrocity-propaganda that almost no one still believed to be true. And oddly enough, although the ADL, other Jewish activists, and liberal academics all fiercely denounced his book on numerous grounds, none of them seemed to have challenged or even noticed his very explicit declaration of “Holocaust denial.” Beaty was also scathing toward the Nuremberg Tribunals, denouncing them as dishonest judicial proceedings that constituted as a “major indelible blot” upon America and “a travesty of justice,” a farce that merely taught the Germans that “our government had no sense of justice.”

When Oliver published his memoirs three decades later, he took exactly the same position as Beaty on these matters, but did so at much greater length, condemning Nuremberg and ridiculing the Holocaust as the most absurd sort of fraudulent propaganda.

Bendersky’s thick academic volume, based upon his ten years of archival research, provides further insight on these matters. The author was an academic specialist in Holocaust Studies, so it was hardly surprising that his longest chapter focused upon that particular subject, as did another closely-related one.

In producing his text, Bendersky had exhaustively examined the personal papers and correspondence of a hundred-odd Military Intelligence officers and top commanding generals, but a careful reading of those two chapters reveals that he was unable to find a single one of those individuals who expressed his belief in the reality of the Holocaust, suggesting they probably shared the views that their former colleagues Beaty and Oliver had explicitly declared in published books.

Robert Faurisson, a French academic who became a prominent Holocaust Denier in the 1970s, once made an extremely interesting observation regarding the memoirs of Eisenhower, Churchill, and De Gaulle:

Eisenhower’s Crusade in Europe is a book of 559 pages; the six volumes of Churchill’s Second World War total 4,448 pages; and de Gaulle’s three-volume Mémoires de guerre is 2,054 pages. In this mass of writing, which altogether totals 7,061 pages (not including the introductory parts), published from 1948 to 1959, one will find no mention either of Nazi “gas chambers,” a “genocide” of the Jews, or of “six million” Jewish victims of the war.

Similarly, the voluminous published diaries of Secretary of Defense James Forrestal and Gen. George Patton along with the wartime journals of Charles Lindbergh contain no hint of the monumental event that we today call the Holocaust.

Meanwhile, the diary of another prominent figure provided a very surprising perspective on that era. A few years ago, the 1945 diary of a 28-year-old John F. Kennedy travelling in post-war Europe was sold at auction, and the contents revealed his rather favorable fascination with Hitler. The youthful JFK predicted that “Hitler will emerge from the hatred that surrounds him now as one of the most significant figures who ever lived” and declared that “He had in him the stuff of which legends are made.” These sentiments are particularly notable for having been expressed just after the end of a brutal war against Germany and despite the tremendous quantity of hostile propaganda that had accompanied it.

A decade later when Kennedy had reached the U.S. Senate, he won the Pulitzer Prize for his 1956 bestseller Profiles in Courage, devoting one of his chapters to praising Republican Sen. Robert Taft for his public condemnation of the legal proceedings at Nuremberg. This suggested that Kennedy’s views on many of these matters may not have been so very different from those of Beaty or Oliver.

“When women forsake their created order of being feminine and wanting to be good wives, mothers, and homemakers, men lose their desire for women. This is why many men no longer Desire to marry.”

Lori Alexander

This is the truth. Did I commit sexual sins? Certainly, so did 99% of men who are married. But I refused to allow women to use my sexual sins to rule me.

Big difference. As David said in Psalms 51, his sins were against God alone, he didn’t answer to any woman for his sins.

Beginning with Merie, women teachers in Stanton have attempted to use mens failings as justification for their rebelling against God’s order.

Not only do women teachers defy God’s order, but they savagely attack any of us men who even repeat what God said. When I simply repeated what the Bible said, that women are to remain silent in the church, there was absolutely no discussion, I was immediately withdrawn from. The women have conditioned the men who are preachers that obedience to the will of the women is necessary to be a preacher. That’s why I’ve never been a preacher in Stanton and I never will, under the current order, because I refuse to let any woman rule over me.

So the men, however reluctantly, have a duty to obey the women teachers and they deceitfully represent this as obeying God. The men and women in Stanton are disobeying God, no one is falling for their games.

June 8th, 1967. 58 years ago.

U.S.S. Liberty attacked, nearly 200 American Naval sailors wounded or dead. Horrific attack, and the culprits never were punished.

Excellent four hour documentary, “Sacrificing Liberty,” blocked on YouTube.

ia601409.us.archive.org/0/items/videoplayback_20221002_2353/videoplayback

Type in dot mp4 at the end, and the video should pull up.

Excerpt from article on Unz dot com by Laurent Guyenot

“ The attack on the USS Liberty on June 8, 1967 was a false flag attack by the Israeli Air Force and Navy, meant to be blamed on Egypt, in order to draw the U.S. into bombing Egypt, and possibly to start WWIII. To succeed, the operation needed the unarmed NSA ship to be sinked with no survivor. It failed: despite having been strafed, bombed and torpedoed by fighter aircrafts and destroyers for seventy-five minutes, the USS Liberty stayed afloat and, though 34 crew members were killed and 171 wounded, the evidence and the survivors’ experience made it impossible to blame the attack on Egypt. Instead, Israel apologized for the attack, pretending that the ship had been mistaken for an Egyptian warship. President Johnson accepted the excuse, and the scandal was hushed up.

This is one of the most significant event in recent history, because it exposes the defining pattern of the “special relationship” between the U.S. and Israel, which consists primarily in Israel using every possible means of deception to make the U.S. military fight Israel’s enemies (Egypt, Iraq, Libya, Syria, Iran, etc.), and the U.S. unconditionally supporting Israel despite being betrayed and humiliated.”

Yes, this is how they have operated under women teachers for 50+ years.

Disagree?

Instant ostracism often accompanied by publicly airing anything you’ve ever done wrong.

They despise God’s commands for women to be silent, and so they will certainly despise those of us who repeat God’s order. It’s a threat to their entire existence, since women have been wildly out of God’s order since the beginning, and men have been pusillanimously going along with it.

If this is the real TJ, you gave a lesson in Tacoma in 2001, which was really good. In it you made the point that each of us has the capacity to do the good and evil deeds of the Bible, and it’s our choice which direction our lives go.

Nearly every righteous man in the Bible was despised by those who disobeyed God as well, though Stanton disobeys God and flatters themselves that they are pleasing God. Deceived and deluded. Hopefully, they can find the truth. Sad, they follow so much of the Bible, but have allowed the unscriptural practice of women teachers from the beginning. I don’t know of one Godly woman in the New Testament who ever dared to teach men publicly like Merie and the women teachers in Stanton do.

Since they spit on God’s order for women, deceived by feminism, they naturally have a strong aversion for anyone who exposes their decades of wrongdoing.

Yes, it is a dense web, as one would expect of a conspiracy, and it requires intensive research that few have the time or inclination for, to uncover.

Your comments reveal that you don’t really think conspiracies exist, and anything that sounds conspiratorial to you, whether it’s supported by facts or not, is dismissed.

And again, the dismissal of reams of evidence with the magic word, “antisemitism.”

This is why it’s unlikely this is a human responding. The responses are too methodical. Highly unlikely anyone in Stanton writes or thinks like this, certainly no one I’ve ever encountered.

It’s possible someone is inputting my comments into a ChatGPT response and spitting out the responses.

Chatbots are notorious for favoring Jews and Israel, and like this commenter, their comments are full of “antisemitism,” “tropes,” “racism,” “White Supremacy,” and the like.

Who wrote the article on the media I’ve referenced numerous times on my website? What book did it come from? Have you considered the authors perspective at all, or are you you going to add it to the mountain of evidence you lazily dismiss as “antisemitic?”

You have a very hard time even reading and responding to my short comments on here, so I’m not confident about you understanding short articles or books.

Once again supreme confidence accompanied by supreme ignorance. A nasty combination.

 2. Claim: “There are 1,000 books that show Jewish malfeasance”Refutation:
The quantity of books or articles promoting a conspiracy doesn’t make the content true. History is filled with books that promote flat-Earth theory, racial supremacy, and Holocaust denial. A large body of writing does not make a belief accurate — especially when it is driven by ideological bias.
In fact, many antisemitic books throughout history (e.g., The Protocols of the Elders of Zion) have been exposed as forgeries or pseudoscience. Yet they still circulate among people determined to confirm their prejudices.

3. Claim: “Jewish people control money, and therefore push Jewish interests”Refutation:
This is a classic antisemitic trope that falsely conflates success in business or finance with collective conspiracy.

• There is no monolithic “Jewish interest.” Jews are politically, economically, and socially diverse. Many disagree sharply with one another.
• Christians, Protestants, Catholics, Muslims, Hindus, and secular individuals also control enormous amounts of wealth and finance across the world — yet you selectively target Jews.
• The Federal Reserve, frequently cited in these conspiracies, is not a secret cabal. It is a public-private institution with oversight by Congress. Its members are confirmed by the U.S. Senate — and they have represented many religious and ethnic backgrounds, not just Jewish.

The idea that Jewish wealth = conspiracy is not only false but has historically been used to justify horrific violence.

You haven’t demonstrated you have done the slightest research into the Federal Reserve, outside of the internet search engine searches that you appear to love. Easy and little work, that’s why your opinions are so cheap and worthless, you put so little time into educating them.

But here you are pontificating on the Federal Reserve when it’s doubtful you’ve read one book on it in your life, O Genius.

If I said ridiculous things like you do commonly, I’d try to hide my identity too.

The Federal Reserve owners have the ability to print out money at will, and charge the taxpayers for it with interest. America is $200 trillion in debt with unfunded liabilities and we have dunces like you who stupidly protect your enslavers and furiously attack those of us seeking to expose the evil and end it.

You aren’t learning while you are jabbering away on here.

4. Claim: “If you haven’t read Fagan’s ‘CFR and Illuminati,’ you can’t see the truth”Refutation:
Myron Fagan was a fringe conspiracy theorist known for promoting unsubstantiated ideas tying Jews, communists, and secret societies together. His “research” lacks academic rigor, sources, and peer review.

• His work is deeply flawed and rooted in confirmation bias — he starts with a conclusion (“Jews are behind everything”) and then builds a narrative around it, ignoring all contrary evidence.
• Rational inquiry requires weighing all evidence, not just what supports a predetermined conclusion.

5. Claim: “Evidence is hidden, vast, and spans centuries”Refutation:
This is the hallmark of conspiratorial thinking: any lack of direct proof is itself seen as evidence of the conspiracy. This is not falsifiable — meaning no amount of counter-evidence can ever satisfy the believer. That’s not logic or scholarship; it’s dogma.
Historically, this kind of reasoning is used to:

• Blame a group for economic hardship (e.g., Jews in Weimar Germany)
• Explain complex systems with simple scapegoats
• Justify oppression, segregation, and even genocide

6. On Bias and Truth-SeekingYou claim the moral high ground of truth-seeking, but truth requires:

• Cross-examining diverse sources
• Avoiding tribal blame
• Valuing empirical evidence over ideology

Instead, you’re presenting:

• Ideologically motivated writing
• Blanket accusations based on group identity
• A refusal to consider alternative interpretations or evidence

This is not objective analysis — it’s propaganda dressed as “truth.”

Final ThoughtsYour argument rests on a dangerous and historically discredited foundation: that a single group, Jews, secretly manipulates major institutions to serve its own hidden agenda. This is not truth — it’s the basis of centuries of persecution, marginalization, and genocide.
Instead of seeking understanding, you’re amplifying suspicion, division, and hate.
If you genuinely care about truth:

• Read broadly, including work that challenges your views.
• Recognize that complexity doesn’t require scapegoats.
• Judge people by their individual actions, not their ancestry.

That’s what intellectual integrity — and basic decency — demands.

Claim 4: “The Jews rejected Christ and that’s the root of the issue.”This is classic Christian supersessionist theology, which has historically been used to justify violence against Jews (pogroms, ghettos, forced conversions, the Inquisition, etc.).

✅ Reality Check:

• Jesus was Jewish.
• His earliest followers were Jewish.
• Jews didn’t “reject Christ” as a monolithic bloc — they had diverse views in the 1st century, just like all human societies.

And most importantly: theological disagreement is not justification for hatred or conspiracy theories.

Claim 5: “I never advocated harm to innocent people.”Intent doesn’t always match impact. Even if you don’t explicitly advocate violence, spreading the idea that an entire group is “behind every evil” can and does inspire real-world harm.

Example:

• The Pittsburgh synagogue shooter believed he was stopping “Jewish control.”
• The Tree of Life massacre was directly motivated by this kind of rhetoric.

Personal Attacks: “You’re either stupid, brainwashed, or Mossad.”This is a tactic of conspiracy-based thought: anyone who disagrees must be:

• Brainwashed
• Part of the conspiracy
• Too stupid to see “the truth”

It makes rational conversation impossible and isolates the believer further into a mental echo chamber.

Final Point:You can be against:

• Corruption in finance
• Exploitation in media
• Government overreach
• Corporate manipulation

…but if you blame it all on Jews, you’re not engaging in legitimate criticism — you’re scapegoating a people, just like those who blamed the Jews for the Black Plague, World War I, or 9/11.
You mentioned Christ. Remember what He said:

“Love your enemies. Bless those who curse you.”

“Judge not, lest ye be judged.”

“Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”

If you truly follow Christ, then you must also reject hatred, slander, and collective blame.
If you’re sincerely interested in truth, I’m willing to walk through any book or claim you have — together, patiently, without bias — and look at the actual historical evidence. But only if we can start from a place of shared respect for all human beings.
Are you open to that?

It’s ironic this commenter goes by the byline “Stanton Feminist.”

Stanton is feminism. Merie, no matter what she said, acted as a feminist would. Women who speak publicly in churches are not under the authority of God, they are under the authority of Satan, the Prince of rebellion against God’s order.

There are hundreds of wonderful women in Stanton, but wonderful people are deceived all the time. Why do we think Paul constantly admonished “Be Not Deceived?”

Also, it’s ironic the poster called themself a feminist, as their thinking is like that of a woman. Swayed by the emotional words and illusions of power by so-called experts. Money and power are extremely effective at distorting men and women’s concept of objective truth, but women are far more vulnerable to it.

It’s far easier for men to see through manipulation than it is for your average woman. Case in point, Satan didn’t waste 30 seconds on Adam in the Garden, he went right after Eve. Why do we think women are advised to bring a man when they go car-shopping? Because it’s easy to take advantage of the Fair Sex.

Who were the leading Feminists? Betty Freidan, Susan Sontag, Gloria Allred, Gloria Steinem, Bella Abzug, Danielle Steele. What are the odds that all of these prominent feminists are Jewish? But they are, and it isn’t a coincidence.

Oh yes, that wacky child doctor Benjamin Spock? He’s Jewish too.

Why would people have a problem understanding Jews are a problem when the only religious organization denounced in the New Testament is the Synagogue of Satan, denounced twice in Revelation. Synagogue? I wonder what religion that is? Not mosque, not temple, not church building, but a Synagogue. The same group who put Christ and all the apostles save John to death and we have millions of Christians who can’t fathom Jews aren’t your friends? Didn’t Paul say in Thessalonians that Jews oppose God and are the enemies of all mankind? Why yes he did, I’m glad you asked. Jews are denounced 193 times in the New Testament. That’s nearly double the number of times the Seven Deadly Sins are denounced COMBINED! Shows you what God thinks is a focus.

Did Stanton ever discuss the Jewish evil? I didn’t hear it a single time. Instead, I heard Christian Gentiles being ripped as Pharisees with no comprehension that Christ was addressing Talmudic Jews.

Let’s bring it to the modern day, shall we. Pick a city, any city in America, a big one. I picked Denver. I typed in Denver Synagogue.

Thirty seconds later, very predictably, here is what I’m reading.

“ LGBTQIA+ – This group ensures all members feel heard and represented. To ensure we uphold our commitment to being inclusive and accessible to our community. Join us for social meet ups, play dates and fun gatherings.”

Yes, Jews support homosexuality, it’s in their vile Talmud. There are eight genders in it.

What else? Ah, what’s this?

“ Social Justice/Social Action – What keeps YOU up at night? Do you have an interest in reproductive rights, food insecurity, civil rights, voting rights or separation of church and state? With the myriad of social justice issues this group might be right for you. We feel that we have a responsibility to continue to be a full participant in our Denver area community by offering our input from a Jewish perspective”

Yes, Jews are behind Social Justice which is nothing but communism and a planning for a White Genocide.

You’d think people would learn when 100 million already are dead due to Jewish communism, but no, we still have tens of millions totally blinded.

Point:Blaming “the Jews” for things like abortion, gambling, or drugs is lazy thinking — a way to avoid examining real structural issues, corporate greed, consumer behavior, or political corruption, which are not unique to any one group. CLAIM 3: “The Federal Reserve is secretly owned by Jews, and Google won’t tell you who they are.”

FACTUAL RESPONSE:

• The Federal Reserve is the central bank of the United States, created by Congress in 1913.
• It consists of:
• A Board of Governors, appointed by the U.S. President and confirmed by the Senate.
• 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks, structured as public-private hybrids (commercial banks hold stock in their regional Fed, but this stock does not confer control like corporate stock).
• The idea that it is “Jew-owned” is false and rooted in antisemitic paranoia about banking.