My (unanswered) email to Gary on August 10, 2004

Good Friday–According to the politically correct view now in vogue,
the Pharisees of 33 A.D. were more sinned against than sinning.

Christ’s Crucifixion is key to understanding human history.
Christ was crucified because he taught that God loves all people equally.

Judaism believes Jews are Chosen by God. In fact, Judaism believes they ARE God.

We know they killed Christ because they never stopped defaming Him and his Gospel of Universal Love.

Now, it’s our turn to be crucified. A fanatical minority, a satanic cult called Chabad has assumed control of all governments. Trump, Netanyahu and Putin belong. They are determined to kill everyone who doesn’t accept Chabad as God. They are organizing another world war to cover for the genocide of all non-Satanists.

Christianity believes that people are intended to express their Divinity. Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect. (Matt 5:48)

Chabad Jews believe non-Jews were created to serve them! They never denied killing Christ. They don’t deny their intention to kill you.

“Nowhere does the Talmud or Moses Maimonides… blame the Romans, as do the modern popes, many Protestant “evangelists” and the corporate media. There are literally thousands of spineless academics and clerics on the Left as well as the Right who minimize the role of the Pharisees, the progenitors of the Talmud of Babylon, in the killing of the Son of God, putting the onus instead on the Romans and Pilate.”

Humanity has been subverted by Satanists and is at a tipping point. As we commemorate Christ’s sacrifice, remember, the same people who crucified Christ
want to crucify you. I’m talking about the central banking cartel. Freemasons and Masonic Jews (Communists & Zionists) are their pawns.

Scapegoating the Romans and Pontius Pilate for Killing Jesus

by Michael Hoffman
(abridged by henrymakow.com)

According to the politically correct view now in vogue, the Pharisees of 33 A.D. were more sinned against than sinning.

Among falsifiers on the Right, are two luminaries in the ersatz “Conservative” firmament. Former Fox News talk show host Bill O’Reilly promotes the manifestly ridiculous Romans-are-to-blame-for-the-Crucifixion imposture in his book, The Last Days of Jesus.

He’s not alone. Andrew P. Napolitano, better known as “Judge Napolitano,” a widely admired figure among “Conservatives,” wrote a column on Holy Thursday in which he had the temerity to state:

“On the first Good Friday, the Romans executed Jesus because they were persuaded that by claiming to be the Son of God, He might foment a revolution against them…they feared a revolution that would disrupt their worldly power, and so they condemned Him to death by crucifixion.” (LewRockwell.com, April 17, 2014). Pharisees are not mentioned anywhere in Mr. Napolitano’s column concerning who is culpable for the Crucifixion of Jesus.

To assert that the Romans bear the lion’s share of responsibility is an atrocious fabrication pleasing to the corporate media and the Cryptocracy.

The fact that Jesus praised a Roman officer above everyone in Israel (Matthew 8:5-13), and the Roman administrator Pilate urgently sought to save Christ’s life, calling him a just man, and being threatened by a mob as a result, is washed down the memory hole.

Historic Christianity, faithful to the Gospel narrative, had a very different view of Pontius Pilate. For example, Francis Turretin (1623-1687), was a distinguished professor of theology and the author of the magisterial, three volume Institutio Theologiae Elencticae, (“Institutes of Elenctic Theology” reprinted as recently as 1994), first published In 1679-85. In vol. II, p. 489-490, Dr. Turretin wrote:

“…the kingdom of Christ…is conducted in a spiritual manner, recognizes no other honors and resources than righteousness, holiness, peace of conscience, salvation and eternal life; no other arms than the Word and the Spirit; no other fortifications than the protection of God. Pilate had this understanding of it. He clearly perceived that no prejudice could be created from it (the kingdom of Christ) against the empire of Caesar; otherwise he would not only have agreed with the accusation of the Jews charging Christ with rebellion against Caesar, but he would have been the first to think of taking Him out of the way.

“However, having dismissed this accusation of the Jews and (accepted) Christ’s own confession concerning His kingly office, Pilate pronounces Him just and innocent, and desires Him to be cleared from condemnation (for he knew that for envy they had delivered Him, Matthew 27:18)…” (End quote from theologian Francis Turretin).

The disinformation that renders the Romans the principal malefactors is also undercut by none other than the Babylonian Talmud itself, in Sanhedrin 43a, where it is stated that the Roman ” authorities” were favorable toward Jesus and did not want to execute him:

Babylonian Talmud: Sanhedrin 43a
“Rather it must be that the case against Jesus was different, because he had close connections with the non-Jewish authorities, and those authorities were interested in his acquittal.” — The Steinsaltz Talmud, volume 17, p. 159 (Random House, 1998).

What is there to debate? We have God’s Word in 1 Thessalonians 2:14-15. This is an unambiguous statement. This Scripture was declared by St. Paul without qualifications of any kind. There is also the testimony of Acts 3-13-15.

Even in our time, one of most authoritative rabbis in the western world is the medieval halakhist Moses Maimonides, “the Rambam.” He is honored in Congress with a sculpture, and venerated in media and academia, though few of his enthusiasts have bothered to discover what he actually taught. We regret to report that Maimonides was an unabashed Jesus-despiser. In his magnum opus, the Mishneh Torah, he declared: “The Christians are idol worshippers” (Avodah Zara 9:4). “Idol worshippers” are subject to severe penalties according to the “Noahide Laws” promoted by every American President from Ronald Reagan forward, under the rubric of “Education Day USA.”

Furthermore, Maimonides taught that Jesus was killed “by the court,” a reference to the Beth Din (rabbinic court): “Yeshu the Christian, who imagined himself the messiah and was killed by the court…” (Rabbi Moses Maimonides, Mishneh Torah: Laws of the King 11:4).

Nowhere does the Talmud or Moses Maimonides, the supreme halachic authority for western Talmudists, blame the Romans, as do the modern popes, many Protestant “evangelists” and the corporate media. There are literally thousands of spineless academics and clerics on the Left as well as the Right who minimize the role of the Pharisees, the progenitors of the Talmud of Babylon, in the killing of the Son of God, putting the onus instead on the Romans and Pilate.

Talmudism is in higher repute in Christendom now than ever in history and it is to the Pharisaic theology founded upon it–and successive texts possessing halachic authority (such as the Mishneh Torah) –to which our apologetic and educational efforts are centered.

Nothing we teach is a negative reflection on Judaic people in general. We unconditionally repudiate the disgusting “Christ-killers” imprecation unjustly leveled at all or most Jews. Due to our own dreadful sins, every one of us is guilty of putting Jesus on that Cross of Calvary and being responsible for His death.

It was from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil that our first parents cursed all humanity, and it was from the “tree” of wood upon which Jesus was crucified, that through him the Gospel invites all of humanity to salvation.

It is incumbent on us as Christians to lovingly correct errors, as did Jesus, John the Baptist and the apostles Peter and Paul. We pray for those who promote the falsehoods of Talmudism. We are not reluctant to proclaim the truth about the Jesus-denying snares and pits into which people fall as a result of the continuing influence of the Pharisaic nullification of Scripture, which was virulent in the first century and which has culminated in the 21st century distortion of the Good Friday narrative.

Copyright 2024 by Independent History and Research

Michael Hoffman is the author of the banned 2008 textbook Judaism Discovered (1,102 pages), and nine other volumes of history and literature, including Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare and its sequel, Twilight Language. Also: The Occult Renaissance Church of Rome, and Adolf Hitler: Enemy of the German People, as well as 122 issues of the periodical, Revisionist History®.

FOR RESEARCH INTO THE DECEPTION IN OUR MONEY SYSTEM

Article on MessanoNews 4/19/25

This is only an excerpt, complete article on my website.

Appendix 1 fron William Gailey Simpson’s “Which Way Western Man?”

HILAIRE BELLOC—Economics for Helen, London, 1938, chapter entitled “Usury”;

The Jews, 2nd edition, Constable, 1937; Monarchy, A Study of Louis XIV, Cassel, 1938,

Preface, pp. vii and viii, and chapter entitled “Monarchy,” pp. 3-17. Belloc, besides being a distinguished man of letters, was one of the outstanding historians of the English-speaking world in this century. Far from being any anti-Semite, he had a Jewish secretary, and in writing his The Jews seemed to be concerned as much for the welfare of the Jews as for that of gentiles.

A.K. CHESTERTON—The New Unhappy Lords, An Exposure of Power Politics, 4th revised and expanded edition, 1972, Britons Pub. Co. American edition, with an Introduction by General P. A. del Valle, Pub. by Omni Pubs., Hawthorne, Calif. “A.K.,”as he was long known by all those who came to be counted among his friends, was in my judgment the most brilliant, illuminating, and reliable journalist of our day. Inevitably, much of his best work went into his paper Candour, The British Views-Letter, of which he was the founder and editor. His book very effectively brings into high relief the part played by the Money Power in shaping and determining the direction of the modern world. When I consulted him for books that would furnish me with reliable information about the Money Power, he recommended especially the next two books in this present list, and sent me his own copies of them.

A.N. FIELD—All These Things, Nelson, New Zealand, 1936. Reprinted by Omni Publications, 1963. His mastery of money problems was evidenced by his being called to witness before the special commission that was appointed to look into the question whether New Zealand should accept a central bank, such as our Federal Reserve. His All These Things is a mine of well-documented information. His The Truth about the Slump carried Mr. Chesterton’s unqualified endorsement, and was also recommended by Prof. Soddy.

Oh so that mr. Potato head would just marry miss potato head. Life would make sense.

The overwhelming things you want me to attend to, not to mention that I am going to be treated as if I can find something else. Pancakes and waffles will never suffice, even though it’s weird and with the best of intentions.

Climb every mountain.

Ford every stream.

How do you solve a problem like Maria?

How do you hold a moonbeam in your hand?

Have you ever seen a firefly a fire fly a firefly?

Whenever I go out, the people always shout!

From William Gayley Simpson’s
“Which Way Western Man?”

Appendix 2

FOR INTRODUCTION TO THE JEWISH QUESTION

Excerpt posted here, complete appendix with dozens of books not found in libraries or in schools, MessanoNews, 4/22/25

Most of those named in the list below need no supporting word from me. Their own status as historians or scientists, their records of brilliant achievement or of high and
faithful service to their country, command respect and confidence. But as there is a disposition abroad to dismiss any writing that can be called “anti-Semitic” with contempt,
as if it were necessarily ill-informed, biased and unjust, I wish to preface my list with the following quotation from The Jews (pp. 153-4) by Hilaire Belloc, who was most emphatically not an enemy of the Jews, who, in any case, was one of the outstanding historians and men of letters of our own time. He said: “It is the greatest mistake in the world to regard the Anti-Semite in the vast numerical strength he has now attained all over our civilization as wholly unpractical and therefore
negligible. . . The strength of Anti-Semitism was and is based not only on intensity of feeling, but also on industry, an industry very accurate in its methods. The Anti-Semite
pamphlets, newspapers and books, which the great daily press is so careful to boycott, form by now a mass of information upon the whole Jewish problem which is already
[1922] overwhelming and still mounting up: and all of it hostile to the Jew. You will not find in it, of course, any material for the Defendant’s Brief, but as a dossier for the prosecution it is astonishing in extent and accuracy and correlation.”

THE ABANDONMENT OF THE CODE OF CIVILIZED WARFARE
 
From William Gayley Simpson’s “Which Way Western Man?”

Appendix 6

For centuries Europeans (including the British) had lived under the code of “civilized warfare,” by which non-combatants were excluded from the scope of hostilities. The Lindemann Plan proposed that this code be abandoned. It urged that military targets were too difficult to hit, and that with effort concentrated on the production of airplanes specially designed for the purpose, “50 percent of all the houses in the cities and towns of Germany with over 50,000 inhabitants would be destroyed.” The Lindemann Plan was adopted, and terror bombing given top priority. The culmination came in 1945, after the war was virtually over, in the attack of several thousand planes on the beautiful and unarmed city of Dresden, overcrowded with hordes of frantic refugees fleeing before the advance of the Russian army. It is estimated that in one night anywhere from 135,000 to 250,000 people, mostly women and children, died. “It was the greatest single massacre in all European history.”

This decision of the British War Cabinet and the bombing that followed “was kept a closely guarded secret from the British public for nearly twenty years.” But eventually, even while being publicly denied, it was officially admitted by Mr. J. M. Spaight, Principal Assistant Secretary of the Air Ministry, and by Air Marshall Sir Arthur Harris, who had been the chief in command. In 1961, the facts, both about the decision and about the bombing, were laid before the world by Sir Charles Snow, a high-placed physicist, in his Godkin Lecture at Harvard in 1960, and published in 1961 with the title of Science and Government by the Harvard University Press in the U.S. and by the Oxford University Press in England. And no denials were forthcoming from any quarter whatever, though when it came to the matter of Dresden, Sir Arthur did apparently feel the need to shift some of the responsibility onto the shoulders of others, and replied: “I will only say that the attack on Dresden was at the time considered a military necessity by much more important people than myself.” Who the “much more important people” were he refrained from disclosing. It is important to add that Mr. Spaight of the Air Ministry, declared that Hitler had been genuinely anxious to reach an agreement with Britain “confining the action of aircraft to the battle zones,” that Hitler undertook the bombing of the British civilian population reluctantly and not until more than three months after the Royal Air Force had commenced the bombing of the German civilian population. And he expressed the opinion that, after it had started, Hitler would at any time have been willing to stop the slaughter. “Hitler assuredly did not want the mutual bombing to go on.”

Who were the men responsible for this ghastly crime against humanity? Sir Arthur Spaight refrained from naming them, but it is high time the question be pressed.

Preeminently they must have been Churchill and Lindemann—above all, it would seem, Lindemann, since it was in his mind that the Plan had its origin, and since Snow reveals that he had a great hold on Churchill, was his very close and inseparable friend; and also that he “was making all the major scientific decisions on the English side of the war,” and had “power greater than that exercised by any scientist in history.”

This, of course, makes it important to know whether or not Lindemann was a Jew. The English people at once assumed that he was. So much so, apparently, that Lord Birkenhead hastily threw together a biography of Lindemann to prove that he was not.
But Snow admits that he may have been Jewish, and casually slips in quite an array of facts that make it difficult to draw any other conclusion. He was positively “not even English by birth,” was a “Central European,” came from Berlin but spoke German only as well as he did English (perhaps much as Kissinger does now), and though he was rich and like many another of the Rothschild species got himself elevated to the rank of a Peer of the Realm, displayed an attitude toward money quite alien to that of the real English aristocracy. It is to be noted, too, that he deserted Germany for England in 1933, the very year that Hitler came to power, and the year also that world Jewry declared war on Hitler and launched both a world-wide economic boycott and a world-wide holy crusade to bring him down. Before leaving, he rounded up some half-dozen of the best Jewish scientists in Germany and took them with him to England, where, in a revitalized Clarendon Laboratory, their genius could work most effectively for the destruction of the most dangerous enemy that Jewry had known in a thousand years. Certainly, I have never known of anyone with the name Lindemann who was not Jewish. And quiet reflection on the meaning of the information supplied by Sir Charles Snow has left me feeling pretty certain that Lindemann was not only a Jew, but an exceptionally vengeful and ferocious one. (See Snow—Science and Government, pp. 10-14, 21-2, 64; and Appendix to Science and Government, 1962, pp. 15, 33.)

Certainly would have removed the way you were having a great experience.

Why do birds fall down from the moon every time you run by.

Join the discussion. Reply. Completely ignore this.

Sorry not sorry.

Christ said out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh and how true that is. If we look into the abstract and seek for the patterns the concrete comes into view very clearly. What does the poster and a catholic priest have in common? They are both single men and religious leaders. They both are perverted by voyeurism and uncleanness. Is he implying with the statement about child molesters and homosexuality among the priesthood that he too is turning his sexual orientation toward homosexual pedophilia? Sure, seems that way. Once the normal boundaries of behavior have been removed it is only a matter of time before the individual becomes completely corrupted and steps over the boundaries into vile behaviors. How many Catholic priests are pedophiles? Not all of them, not some of them but a very small percentage of the priests are corrupted, so why then mention the corrupt minority unless of course that is what one is identifying with and thinking about. With his irrational fears and uncontrollable anger is there any doubt that he has failed to control his lustful desires and without realizing it, he is now admitting, in the third person, what he is becoming?

Fear not. Allow me to say that, for those deemed enemies of my people, and who are perceived as credible threats to our cause through various platforms of media influence, monitoring of their activities is being conducted, and tracking of their movements as well. Sometimes individuals slip up on their own, and other times, a little push is needed, but law enforcement is always there waiting either way.

Ftyihddg fudgjj ccgjf dudhf fugfh bfgju.

Thanks for letting us out with your in-laws.

Dinner was delicious as always.

Quick question to you sir. Please refer back to the children’s museum and see if both new members are available.

Today is today’s day off.

Service and family are the best things to consider.

Proverbs 15:2

2] The tongue of the wise useth knowledge aright: but the mouth of fools poureth out foolishness.

Thousands of years later, and the scripture still comes to life.

Arizona is an intellectual and moral midget, and frustrated with being exposed, he throws a temper tantrum by posting gibberish multiple times.

Very soon your IP will be blocked and we will be rid of your nuisances.

The legalist (and I know, because I spent more than the first two decades of my life steeped in this mindset) cannot see the big picture that his understanding of the law (or misunderstanding, as the case may be) is different than the next person’s. His knee-jerk reaction against moral relativism turns him toward the absolutism of Phariseeism, or legalism. Yes, it’s true that truth itself is not relative; but our understanding of it grows over time as we mature in mental capacity, life experience, and spiritual understanding. Realizing that fact ought to give us some humility and cause us to exercise an abundance of caution in holding others to our own interpretational standards of the “The Law.”

I wonder how much drug and alcohol use you have, just curious how you became so dull and delusional.

Incapable of understanding basic truths.

Your approach and behavior on this website perfectly exemplifies how Black Americans have committed 300,000,000 crimes against Whites since 1965.

You lack reason and empathy, and have this arrogance that enables you to have misplaced confidence when it’s obvious you are incapable of grasping basic truths. You then use the Bible in a vain effort to justify your behavior, not realizing Christianity understood there are major differences between the races.

You show this daily on this website, and you are so stubbornly insistent on not seeing this, you will fill the website with nonsense comments to try to crush out the truth you can’t accept.

You want others to listen to you, accept you, and love you, when you behave like a wretch, and after exhibiting constant lying, you wonder why you are so intensely disliked.

It’s obvious you don’t like yourself, because if you did, you wouldn’t lie so much and constantly try to degrade others. A person who loves God and themselves doesn’t treat others as you treat nearly everyone you encounter.

While you insist on criticizing and trying to tear down others, you appear to be incapable of having a basic written conversation.

You show little comprehension of facts and questions addressed to you, and have a terrible time responding on topic and with relevant information.

You have filled this website for years with your evil surmising, your lies, and now that that’s been exposed, you’ve resorted to filling the website with nonsense comments.

What is your goal here? No Christian in history ever acted like you. No one in the Bible would tolerate your behavior. God and Jesus reject you.

Why don’t you repent, and start telling the truth for a change?

Remember the Amber Alert? Neither do I.

Frogs feet look exactly like frog’s feet. Rejoice ever-so-lsoftly.

Curtains matching the theme portrayed in the documentary can be a problem.

Please just let cauliflower be cauliflower. It was never intended to be a roast beef.

hen we take the descriptive language used in the Bible for the church as a proper name, we are denominating it–we are giving it a name. That makes the “Church of Christ” a denomination. Why do we name pets, people, cities, buildings, churches, etc.? The only reason for naming anything is to distinguish it.

Too bee or knot two bee. That is the ?

Your tone is rather mild. Even your dementor is demented.

Quite ridiculously expensive for the kids to be able to zoom in and out.

I long to hear your rolling thunder and ominous rumbling. Those Daines have quite a bit of roof damage.

Zippideeeee dooooooda zipideeeeayyyyy. My oh my what a wonderful day

A bitter cup of fertilizer shall be placed on the place where the place is.

Tooth decay can be summed up in two simple words. Decaying teeth. Please make a note of this and share it with your soldiers far and wide.

Victoria Cynthia Crystal Evangeline is a big name for a tiny baby.

Feeling like a pincushion at target was not the best experience nor was it the worst experience.

While watching Dan Finkel talk about math games in last week’s video, I noticed something fascinating – we show the number 3 with our fingers in completely different ways! What I thought was the “normal” way to show 3 is actually how you sign the number 6 in ASL.

I see by your outfit that you are a cowboy. And here I am at Camp Grenada with no outfit befitting my situation. Oh the tragedy.

For reasons beyond my control there will be no shredded shrimp on tonight’s menu. Please don’t complain to your server about your personal problem with this situation.

I would love to have three friends over to pester the side-saddle sellers but wouldn’t that be a bit much? Admit it, I’m right.

Oh for Pete’s sake!

So sad.

Witness the rabid determination to disrupt ideas someone doesn’t like.

If the person believed in violence, they would murder. You can see here their hatred leads them to do anything to attack what they don’t like.

We can’t win a debate, so we try to sabotage the website, which is so infantile, juvenile, childish, and foolish.

If this is Arizona, and there is strong evidence it is, this demonstrates why Lincoln said that Blacks and Whites cannot live peacefully together.

He begins lying and posting nonsense comments when he’s exposed in a debate.

It will be said that multiculturalism works well in Stanton. But Stanton is out of line and always has been, with women seizing control of the church from the start by speaking in public.

It is impossible to have any discussion of women speaking in Bible classes or to discuss the strategy of mixing the White race out of existence in Stanton at all. Never mind that the White race has gone from 30% to 10% from 1910 to today, many in Stanton will say, “That’s of the devil and Satan.” And that’s the end of the discussion.

I’ve never heard the Talmud discussed in Stanton despite thousands of classes on the false teachings of other churches. Have you?

And the Talmud is far worse than any other holy book ever discussed. I don’t know any other holy book that legalizes rape, murder, lying, cheating, child molestation, and a host of other evils.

As the Air Force knows, the flak begins coming on strong when you are over the target.

We see constant efforts to lie about the truth, distort it, attack it, smother it, and silence it.

The only ones mad at you for speaking the truth are those living a lie. Arizona is living a lie, and there are a few in Stanton who desperately hope to silence me. However, the vast majority are simply trying to please God and are deceived by the women teaching in public doctrine.

You would think when a person resorts to littering a website with nonsense comments it might begin to dawn on them that maybe their beliefs are mistaken, and perhaps it’s time to consider new beliefs, but not the fanatical zealot who is about to have their IP blocked.

Also, notice, whoever you are, and whatever your motives are, they cannot be good, because the righteous don’t hide and they never frivolously dismiss and scoff at irrefutable facts.

I wish i had a lalalalalala. Im speaking from pfhitg dhtuj xgyg fuyjk.

Imagine a group of individuals listening and taking notes while a preacher teaches against fishing and rebukes the poor soul who had the worldly notion to go fishing. Nobody asks if there might be a bit of a problem with the teaching considering the numerous Biblical examples of people fishing. I guess the fish that fed the multitudes were purchased at Fishmart so the disciples would not waste their time fishing when there were souls to save and work of the church to do.

The charge of murmuring is an easy weapon in the hands of Stanton teachers and preachers to strike fear into the hearts of the flock should they get the crazy notion of disagreeing with them. The cleverness of the charge is its easy adaptation to any situation. Nearly any disagreement can be twisted into an accusation of so-called “murmuring,” complete with vivid imagery of Korah leading his insurrection against Moses.

Have you reached out to the city leaders? They need to travel to your registration center.

For years the Sheriff was getting help.. he made a full recovery after getting everything he needed.

Have you been denied insurance? make a few calls to at least 12 former sous chefs. I assure you, you will receive the best outcome.

I see by your outfit that you are a hiphop dancer. Congratulations for this powerful testimony.

I can recount the details of your recent vacation. Ask me any questions after you read the poetry.

In the year 2,000 Gertrude tried to leave but she had to walk away 11 years later.

There are reports on the porch being poorly built.

Extraordinarily important read! Long but worthwhile.

This topic is so important, that I will post all five books and their reviews, one each day for the next five days.

From William Gayley Simpson’s “Which Way Western Man”

Appendix 7
“The Myth of the 6 Million”

This covers the central trick used to defend Jewish supremacism from scrutiny. The Holocaust.

These are, by far, to my mind, the most convincing proof laying out that the Holocaust never happened at all.

An excerpt is below, the complete Appendix is in the pictures below.

2. Christophersen, Thies—Auschwitz, Truth Or Lie? An eye-witness account. 13 pictures.
Published in Germany in 1973. Translated and now available from Liberty Bell Publications, Reedy, WV 25270. The author, not as an internee but as a scientist, was sent to Auschwitz to do research in the production of synthetic rubber for making tires. Auschwitz was the largest and most important of the industrial concentration camps. In these, the Government put prisoners to work producing all kinds of material for the war effort. The author spent the whole of 1944 in Auschwitz. He had the free run of the camp, and visited all the separate camps of which the Auschwitz complex was composed, including Birkenau. His wife was allowed to visit him, and he remarked: “This fact, that we were able to have our relatives visit us at any time, should prove that the camp administrators had nothing to hide. Had Auschwitz been the death factory it is reputed to have been, such visits would certainly not have been permitted.” And he declared conclusively: “During the whole of my time at Auschwitz, I never observed the slightest evidence of mass gassings.”

There once was a man from the sticks
Who loved to compose limericks
But he failed at his sport
They were always too short…

A canner, exceedingly canny,
One morning remarked to his granny,
“A canner can can
Anything that he can;
But a canner can’t can a can, can he?”

An elephant slept in his bunk,
And in slumber his chest rose and sunk.
But he snored – how he snored!
All the other beasts roared,
So his wife tied a knot in his trunk.

I need a front door for my hall,
The replacement I bought was too tall.
So I hacked it and chopped it,
And carefully lopped it,
And now the dumb thing is too small.

How to spell the potato has tried
Many minds, sometimes mine, I’ll confide.
Though it may have an eye,
There’s no E – don’t ask why!
Not until it’s been baked, boiled, or fried.

I’m papering walls in the loo
And quite frankly I haven’t a clue;
For the pattern’s all wrong
(Or the paper’s too long)
And I’m stuck to the toilet with glue.

There was a young fellow of Crete
Who was so exceedingly neat.
When he got out of bed
He stood on his head
To make sure of not soiling his feet.

An amoeba named Max and his brother
Were sharing a drink with each other;
In the midst of their quaffing,
They split themselves laughing,
And each of them now is a mother.

A painter, who lived in Great Britain,
Interrupted two girls with their knitting,
He said, with a sigh,
“That park bench, well I,
Just painted it, right where you’re sitting.”

I see by your outfit that you are a beanie baby collector. Good for you!

Amusing to see those desperate to assert themselves, but having nothing to say. Out of sheer frustration, rather than admit they are wrong, and choose new beliefs, they throw a temper tantrum, while hiding of course, and fill the blog with nonsense.

This is an indictment of the schools and church. The schools train people in ignorance, and that you follow authority figures. That’s taught in Stanton too.

Humans who are incapable of critical thinking respond as we see here. Unable to come up with a coherent response, they simply throw out rubbish.

What kind of a miserable human being hides and spends time every day trying to sabotage a website with lunatic comments?

Truly sad.

You see they think this is amusing, a hallmark of fools.

Haha, let’s see what our delusional friend posts tonight at around midnight west coast time, with their swarm of nonsense.

Extraordinarily important read! Long but worthwhile.

This topic is so important, that I will post all five books and their reviews, one each day for the next five days.

From William Gayley Simpson’s “Which Way Western Man”

Appendix 7
“The Myth of the 6 Million”

This covers the central trick used to defend Jewish supremacism from scrutiny. The Holocaust.

These are, by far, to my mind, the most convincing proof laying out that the Holocaust never happened at all.

An excerpt is below, the complete Appendix is in the pictures below.

4. Harwood, Richard E.—Did Six Million Really Die? Historical Review Press, 1975,
Richmond, Surrey, England. 12 illustrations. Available from Examiner Books, P.O. Box
783, New York City, 10022 and from Liberty Bell Pubs., Reedy, WV 25270. It was written before Professor Arthur Butz’ book was published. Of all the available books that examine the Six Million charge, this is the most compendious, up-to-date and easily read. And it is by an Englishman, a specialist devoted to the investigation of political and diplomatic aspects of the Second World War, and associated with London University. And his book completely demolishes, item by item, the claim that the Nazi Government
put six million Jews to death.
(a) To begin with, the six million figure, on the basis of statistics supplied by the World Almanac, the New York Times, and the Jews own published computations, it is absolutely
impossible to maintain. By careful compilation and analysis of the most reliable statistics, and checking them one against another, Harwood comes to the conclusion that “the number of Jews in Nazi-occupied Europe after emigration [which totaled some 3.5
million] was scarcely more then 3 million, by no means all of whom were interned.”

Even the Jewish Joint Distribution Committee “officially” estimated that over 1.5 million Jews lived in Nazi-occupied territory right through the war. This means that “the number
of possible wartime Jewish deaths could not have exceeded a limit of one and a half million” (pp. 5-6). It is surely significant that by 1961, at the Eichmann trial, “the Jerusalem Court studiously avoided mentioning the figure of Six Million, and the charge drawn up by [the prosecution] simply said ‘some’ millions” (p. 9).

There is way more to this review, it is on my website.

A mouse in her room woke Miss Dowd
She was frightened — it must be allowed.
Soon a happy thought hit her —
To scare off the critter,
She sat up in bed and meowed.

There was an old person of Fratton
Who would go to church with his hat on.
‘If I wake up,’ he said,
‘With a hat on my head,
I will know that it hasn’t been sat on.’

No woodsman would cut a wood, would he
If woods would be woodless – nor should he.
Yet no woodcutter would
Cut a woody-wood wood
If no woodsmen cut woody woods, would he?

There was an old man of Peru,
Who dreamt he was eating his shoe.
He woke in the night,
With a terrible fright,
And found it was perfectly true.

There was a young lady named Perkins,
Who just simply doted on gherkins.
In spite of advice,
She ate so much spice,
That she pickled her internal workins’.

If you catch a chinchilla in Chile
And cut off its beard, willy-nilly
You can honestly say
That you have just made
A Chilean chinchilla’s chin chilly.

What are some common phrases used by covert narcissists?

Types of comments you might hear from a covert narcissist include:

“I’m too good for this. I shouldn’t have to tolerate these people.”
“I deserve all of the good things life has to offer.”
“Other people have it better than me and it isn’t fair. I deserve more because I am better than other people.”
“People never appreciate how special I am.”
“I can’t believe you did that. Don’t do that again. You should feel ashamed.”
“Remember when I helped you a few years ago? You owe me a favor.”
“I’m the best you’ll ever have. You’ll never find anyone else like me.”
“No one else would give you the time of day. You should be grateful I stick around.”
“I was just joking. I can’t believe you took that seriously.”

Covert narcissists often behave in passive-aggressive ways. They disregard others while exaggerating their own importance. They also blame, shame, and ignore the feelings and needs of other people.

Examples of Covert Narcissist Behavior
To spot the signs of a covert narcissist, it can be helpful to look at how narcissistic traits may emerge in different settings.

In the workplace, covert narcissism may look like:

Treating colleagues with superiority and condescension
Creating a public image that is completely different than private behaviors
Making unreasonable demands on co-workers and subordinates
Belittling and blaming others for mistakes
Gossiping about others in the workplace
Expressing rage and then denying their anger

The incredible Wizard of Oz
Retired from his business because
Due to up-to-date science
To most of his clients
He wasn’t the Wizard he was.

Is algebra fruitless endeavor?
It seems they’ve been trying forever
To find x, y, and z
And it’s quite clear to me:
If they’ve not found them yet then they’ll never.

In other relationships, such as those with partners, parents, siblings, or other family members, covert narcissists might do any of the following:

Display a lack of empathy for the feelings, thoughts, and needs of others
Use guilt trips and shame to control others
Expect others to care for them or solve their problems
Gaslighting behaviors, such as being critical but making it sound like it is coming from a place of concern
Take advantage of other people’s vulnerabilities
Dismiss or deny other people’s feelings, emotions, or experiences
Respond to others with passive-aggressive behaviors

22 comments from the ignorant, deluded, and despicable Arizona.

Incredible, he can be told the truth dozens of times and still rejects it. Still, he loves his psychobabble, as mixed in with his 22 nonsense comments are 3-4 where he starts repeating the psychiatric rubbish about “narcissists” that he unfortunately learned.

Where did he learn it? He says he didn’t learn it in college. He says he doesn’t read, and anyone can figure out he doesn’t read from his writing and reasoning style. So where did he learn it? Is it because the criminal justice system sent him to a shrink because of his bad behavior?

Quite likely. Imagine what chaos a man with his reasoning skills would do in society. His behavior on here is why he was likely withdrawn from in Stanton. Utterly incapable of being reasoned with and full of wicked hatred. They call men like him psychopaths in real life. It’s interesting to ponder what he thinks of himself. It appears he thinks of himself as a preacher, though it’s obvious he has no wisdom or knowledge to teach others with, or if he does, it’s clouded out by the hatred that chokes out all his good qualities.

When his frequent lying was noted, he now engaged in a screaming temper tantrum, posting not five, not ten, not fifteen, but TWENTY-TWO nonsense comments to emphasize his determination to sabotage the website.

I’m not a big believer in mental illness, and I know Stanton went way overboard with diagnosing people as having lost their minds. Still, this kind of behavior that Arizona demonstrates, constant lying, inability to rationally respond, constant condemnation, is a demonstration of mental unwellness, and far be it from me to diagnose a man as having lost his mind, but one thing I do know, that when God says in 2 Timothy 1:7 that he has given Christians a sound mind, this poster has an unsound mind.

As long as he’s enslaved by ignorance and delusions, he’s never getting a sound mind.

“Arguing with a fool is like playing chess with a pigeon; no matter how good you are, the bird is going to knock the pieces over, crap on the board, and strut around like it won.” – Scott D. Weitzenhoffer

We see that here.

Though this is the first time someone has resorted to posting complete nonsense, to try to win an argument, lol.

Ultimately, if America was still 90% White, as it should be, and would be if it weren’t for the malevolent 1965 Hart-Cellar Act, and if Lincoln had sent slaves back to Africa, there would be no argument.

Arizona is demonstrating exactly why the races should not be in the same country. He has been trained to hate Whites by the Jewish media, and to think of himself as a victim. Notice how he constantly refers to Jew psychobabble to justify his deranged ideas.

America was built on Greek, Roman, and Christian ideals, which were White. After 60 years of diversity, it’s clear integration has been a rousing failure. Never in human history have Whites mixed their blood and survived.

Look at the Old Testament, this is why the Jews were so severe about forbidding intermarriage.

Arizona is angry and trying desperately to attain the “equality” he was trained to think he has. He doesn’t realize it was equal opportunities not equal outcomes. Having never educated himself with reading, he’s now furiously trying to defend the idea he’s been taught since he was a boy, that he’s capable of asserting himself in any conversation, even when he’s dead wrong and ignorant on a topic.

At least he isn’t violent that we know of, 6% of America is comprised of Black men and they are responsible for 50-70% of all violent crimes, murders, and rapes.

Arizona knows this is true, but he’s angry at it, and hates me for telling the truth about it.

Like Cain, he refuses to uphold the truth himself, but sets out, out of envy, to attack Abel, who set out to please God. Telling the truth pleases God.

Bear bear bear bear

Dandelion dandelion dandelion dandelion

Fish fish fish fish

Horse horse horse horse

Jeans jeans jeans jeans

Lemon lemon lemon lemon

Nest nest nest nest

Pizza pizza pizza pizza

Rain rain rain rain rain rain rain

Umbrella umbrella umbrella

“Wise men speak because they have something to say; fools because they have to say something.”

– Plato